Transubstantial Elements
A.) Categories of the Practical Understanding
I.) Qualities
II.) Quantity
III.) Possession
IV.) Location
V.) Action
VI.) Passion
B.) Categories of the Practical Precepts
I.) Virtues
II.) Morality
III.) Apperception
IV.) Axioms
Metaphysical Introduction of the Conceptual Practical Intuition
I.A.) Of the Definition of the Conception of a Practical Religion
I.B.) Of the Conceptualization of the Anti-Thesis of a Practical Religion
I.C.) Of the Definitive Practicality of a Practical Religion
Section I
I.A.) Metaphysical Exploration of the Synthetic A Priori
I.B.) Mathematical Conceptual of the Synthetic A Priori
I.C.) Metaphysical Exploration of Transformative Logic
1.D.) Mathematical Conceptual Formulation of Transformative Logic
1.E.) Of the Conceptual Definition of Transformative Logic
1.F.) Of the Essential Postulates of Transformative Logic
Section II
II.A.) Of the Definition of Transubstantial Logic
II.B.) Of the Conceptual Context of Transubstantial Logic
II.C.) Of the Mathematical Conception of Transubstantial Logic
II.D.A.) Of the Essential Postulates of Transubstantial Logic
II.D.B.) Of the Essential Postulate of Necessity in Transubstantial Logic
II.D.C.) Of the Essential Postulate of Potentiality in Transubstantial Logic
II.D.D.) Of the Essential Postulate of Actuality in Transubstantial Logic
II.E.I.) Of the Practical Antinomy of Transubstantial Logic
II.E.II.) Of the Religious Antinomy of Transubstantial Logic
II.E.III.) Of the Practical Canon of Transubstantial Logic
Section III
III.A.) Of the Practical Substances of Transubstantial Logic
III.B.) Of the Practical Ideals of Transubstantial Logic
III.C.) Of the Practical Analytic of Transubstantial Logic
III.D.) Of the Practical Apperception of Transubstantial Logic
III.E.) Of the Practical Intuition of Transubstantial Logic
III.F.) Of the Practical Cognition of Transubstantial Logic
III.G.) Of the Conceptualization of the Practical Range of Motion
III.H.) Of the Practical Conversion of the Trichotomy of Transubstantial Logic
III.I.) Of the Practical Energy of Transubstantial Logic