**I.A. Metaphysical Exploration of the Synthetic A Priori**

The ever-peering conceptual definition of the * Synthetic A Priori* by the great illumination of Immanuel Kant has provided Humanity with the
epistemic definition of engaging into the constructive conceptual analysis of abstractive tenses of mathematical certainty that broke the plains of possibility of the conceptualization of prior
experience after the rational and empirical method. And, the conceptual grasp of the inherent possible epistemic revolutions of precognitions of

But, yet nevertheless, it is here with the conceptual extension of the formula provided not only the entrails of mathematical possibilities of * a
priori* avenues that fall within the conceptual definition of rational knowledge of it. And, let us take another adventure into the concept of the

Now, let us take into account Immanuel Kant's proposition of “* All bachelors are unmarried people*” as the first term defines itself as an
absolute that needs no further epistemic investigations while the second terms as well needs no further epistemic investigations. And, the finished conceptualization of the combined term required no
further explanations as all the terms are relative to the absolution of conceptualizations, thereby, providing the necessary arrangements of absolute rational and empirical evidence as definitions in
the dictionary are either an

**I.B. Mathematical Conception of the Synthetic A Priori**

And in the geometrical formulation of the * Synthetic A Priori*, we shall find the sphere of possibilities and absolutes in the mathematical
conditions of the knowledge that is independent in all religious experiences, as well as a degree of certainty of the pure and human understanding, which the rational and empirical manifold
undertakes in the conceptualization of a material object of the geometrical qualities. Now, let us undertake the sensory manifold that requires the conceptual rationalization of the geometrical
addition to the thing-in-itself, and needs no further rational investigations to fore-call the religious experience, as the geometrical conceptualization of it is relative to religious experiences

However, if we are to inductive investigate the findings of the proposed mathematical formula of Immanuel Kant, we may find an interesting conclusion to the sensory
admixture of possible and absolute numbers that intrigue the human understanding in the apperception of it as the totality of the paring of the * odd and even numbers* provide
an illumination to the ever-seeking sensible manifold of the rational adventurer. We have mentioned previously, that 7 individuates into 7 while the totality of the formula in the answer of 12 can be
divided by each odd number to equal 2 and 2(

Now, let us reexamine the proposition of Kant's synthesis of the previous example of the “* All bachelors are unmarried people*” as the
absolution is carried into every term of the proposition of his example. And, the polytypic concepts of “

Now, let us reexamine once again the proposed example of our synthesis of the previous example of “* All bachelors are unmarried people*” as we
have determined that the conceptual synthetical conceptual manifestation of “

But, yet moreover, in the sphere of mathematical certainty of * synthetic a priori knowledge,* the concept of a single derivative of absolution
can be certain in the fore-calling of the subject-matter in a proposed example as it must contain a term(s) of absolution, as well as the corresponding mathematical set(s) of the proposed problem and
solution. And, it follows that the proposed set(s) are to contain these essential degrees of variations, to formulate the conceptual polytypic concepts of mathematical and rhetorical certainty as in
all practical religious experiences the “

**I.C. Metaphysical Exploration of Transformative Logic**

And, in the conceptual intuition of Transformative Logic, the practical intuition of mathematical and rhetorical certainty can be found in the interchangeable
absolution of the polytypic concepts as the insertion of possibilities into the realm of absolution can be complete with this method of rational and empirical intuition by the interchangeable
solutions of absolution. Let us reexamine the conceptual method of the s* ynthetic a priori* as the conceptual method of this example has provided the conceptual absolution of
“

And, the mathematical solution is provided in the practical means of an absolution as “* Marriage*” is a totality of one while “

But, yet nevertheless, in Transformative Logic, it is stated that rational sensory experiences are enhanced by the emotions of particular feeling that enhances the
rational and empirical manifold of the sensible datum which all practical human experiences is relative to the logical method of rationality in a pure * synthetic a priori.*
Now, let us state the following terms of

Now, let us continue the conceptual investigations of the conceptual analysis of the prior observations in the term of “* All bachelors are unmarried
people*” as the mathematical formula would include the set of {1,2}, and the practical judgment of pure reason of the human understanding that provides the practical judgment of pure
reason to peer out the conceptual description of the mathematical formula, as well as the absolute terms of the subject-matter of the conceptual formula that provides the subject matter of
“

And, yet, in the subject matter of the previous example, we are to find that manifestation of the subject matter is not a concrete-and-fixed conceptual manifestation
of an absolution in a practical conceptualization of the transfigured insertion of **synthetic*** a priori knowledge* as the conceptual tenses of it are
transformed by a singular concrete-and-fixed subject of conceptual knowledge. For example, in one conceptual retrospective hand, the previous example of "

**I.D. Mathematical and Conceptual Formulation of Transformative Logic**

And, in the conceptual formulation in * Transformative Logic*, the conceptual manifold of the

But, yet it is moreoverso, in * Transformative Logic*, the sensible regulation of the spherical construction of the intellectual and emotive
regulation is contained in the concrete subject and object of the phenomenal calling while the possible subject and object beckons the relative tenses of each thing in-itself. Now, if we were to
examine the previous examples in the following paragraphs of each example such as; - “

But, yet it is to be exclaimed in the pretense of Transfomative Logic, that precognitions are the rational and manifolds of the * synthetic a priori
knowledge* which underlie the affirmative concrete base of conceptual constructions of sensible datums, and the categorical sentence of

And, in consequently of the mathematical certainty of the conceptualization of * Transformative Logic* of the precognitions of all religious
experiences in the practicality of the

**I.E. Of the Conceptual Definition of Transformative Logic**

But, yet evermoreso, in the conceptual manifold of Transformative Logic, it is the fore-calling of the practical tense of the rational and empirical framework in the
conceptual datum that decrees the precognitions the relative tenses of the emotive tense, of which regulates the cognition of abstractive sensible concepts while the rational tense of cognition
implies the foreknowledge of practical sense of concepts. And, in the spherical pretenses of the sensible and practical senses, the multiplication of it extracts the rational and empirical manifold
to formulate a pretense of a conceptual categorical sentence of a pure intuition with the intuitive sense of predicates and adjective in relation to the nouns and verbs in the images set of the pure
understanding, whereas, the pure understanding inhibits the conceptual manifold into the object-matter of the of the categorical sentence to formulate into the concrete-and-fixed practical judgment
of the categories of the pure religious understanding. It is here where the pretense of the practical sensible datum separates the admixture of pure and practical cognition to formulate the practical
conceptual manifold subset underlying the constant flow of pure undercurrents of practicality in all our tenses of the syntactical images sets that corresponds to the concrete-and-fixed abstractions
of the practical understanding. But yet, in the admixture of pretensive spectrum of abstractive practical images and icons in the conceptual manifold of the practical meshing of syntactical
categories, there are the practical subsets of experience itself, while the practical sets of epistemic axioms in-itself vents in the practical schema of common sensibles in the pure understanding of
the religious categories of deontic logic. And, in the common sensibles of the practical understanding, the epistemic practical sets of * Transformative Logic* is relative to
the epistemic subsets of religious experiences in all practical religious accounts of the precognitions of concrete-and-fixed images of sensuous impressions of a

And, in the absractive accounts of the pure and practical understanding of all religious experiences in the identification of a common sensible in the pure and
practical precepts in the human understanding, the sensory modality of the practical impressions of the precognitions are relative to the * cognitions of a posteriori*
investigations as

Let us reexamine the previous example that was stated earlier in the previous paragraphs to better understand the concept manifold of our investigations, in the
categorical example of “* All bachelors become happy people in marriage*.” We found that a universal concept of “

And, it is to be aforementioned in the previous example of the epistemic value of the **synthetic*** a priori knowledge,*
the rational and empirical formulation of the conceptual admixture of the corresponding values of epistemic revolutions of the sensible manifold is the necessity of the universal and interchangeable
axioms in the conceptual epistemic values as all conceptual synthesis of epistemology are the corresponding to the terms within the syntatical connection of

But, yet it is everso, that the perceptional adhesion of the emotive regulation in the abstractive constructions of * a priori* conceptions
which inhibits the mental apprception of the construction of the noumenon that allows the essential arrangements to the conceptual manifold of the pure understanding, and the substantial conception
of the phenomena relates independently of the conceptual distinction of the conceptual separation in the former tenses of the pure understanding. Furthermore, all

**I.F. Of the Essential Postulates of Transformative Logic**

**I.F.A. Of the Essential Postulate of Necessity**

And, in the inherent rational and empirical manifold of the construction of conceptual phenomena, the essential subsistent of rational cognition of the adage of
perceptual adherence of emotive regulation of the mental manifold in the pure understanding, and the apperception of mental phenomena grasps in the functions of an empirical sense of the pure
understanding, as well as the rational sense of the functions of the practical categories of logic. But, yet in turn, in the functions of the totality of the pure understanding of the conceptual
makeup, there must be the sound empirical element of **a*** posteriori knowledge* ensue the conceptual charge of

It is evermoreso in the confines of the sensible modalities of the pure understanding, that the conceptual construction of the internal and external sense of
perception in the intrinsic value of * a prior knowledge,* in which the pure understanding cognizes the common sensibilities of practical reason and emotion of the formulation
of sense experience in itself. But, yet in the introspection of practical reason ,the sensible modalities of the internal and external sense of practical reason never allows the sensory experience
into the chambers of the internal and external sense which disregards the antinomies of the practical reason itself, and the resolutions of the extension of rational and emotive sense perceptions it
here where the fore-calling, fore-knowledge and precognitions lay in a sensible harbor of the perceptual manifold in the subject-matter and predicate. Let's us reexamine the proposed mathematical
problem of “

**I.F.B Of the Essential Postulate of Possibility**

And,in the spherical supposition of the sensible manifold in the practical understanding, we are to find that in the perceptual manifold only begins to peer out of the
dark shadows of misconception as the absolute terms of the rational and emotive manifolds of sensory experience in the eternal and internal sense pivots itself upon the epistemic axiom of the
interdependent relative numeration to the possibility of mathematics. In one trans-illuminate retrospective tense, the relation of the mathematical terms in a possibility configures to the
interchangeable circumvents of the mathematical conceptions of * odd numbers* which the multiplication to a numerical value of concrete-and-fixed forms enhances it, while on
the other transfigured introspective hand, the addition or multiplication of the possibility of the mathematical conception are a derivative of the essential postulates of possibility, and the
concrete-and-fixed forms are relative to all possibilities of mathematical conception. For is it not that in concrete-and-fixed ideas that are practical terms that measure the distance and angles in
Geometry that a variance of a possible solution can be derived from a possible point? For is it not that absolutes contain an admixture of concrete-and-fixed ideas as the perceptual construction of
it are heighten by the possibilities of the integers added or multiplied to them? Henceforth and in consequently in all practical mathematics and formulations, the essential mental constructions of
the rational and empirical manifold are divided into a mathematical formula as pure intuition of the

Yet it is nevertheless into the forthcoming adventures of the mental concepting of all triangular pretensive experience of the pure understanding, whether it is a
priori and/or a posteriori of the rational and sense of the mental manifold the pure intuition where it is a "nill-and-vide" of the practical * synthetic a priori* in the
precognitions of deja vu perception in the conceptual manifold in the pure understanding, but in the fairness of the investigations that this new-binding conceptual digestion of the pure knowledge
springs out of the concrete-and-fixed convictions in the practical understanding, engaging in the contemplation of the reasonable and emotive sensible touch which clarify in a trans-illumination.
And, in the forejuding of the up-and-coming clarity that the sensible manifestations of the practical understanding overbears the conceptual synthetical manifold of the constructs and releases the
mental manifold of diverse emotional and mental embracing of the practical constructs of pure reason. But, hitherto the pure understanding of the conceptual possibilities of the relative tenses of
the pure understanding that provide the clarity of the sensible manifold in all practical reason as the conceptual manifold of the pure understanding allows the switching of the polar opposites to
formulate into the conceptual synthesis of the pure understanding. It is up-till-now, that the sensible apperception of the pure understanding has allowed all precognitions of the pure intuition, the
foreground of noumenon and phenomena without regard to the pure intuitions of the rational and empirical manifold as the dissolution of the phenomena is the conceptual framework of the ideological
pretense, rather than, the practical pretense of the sensible construct in the practical understanding of rationality and emotive origins. For is it not that the practical understanding self-involves
itself in the rational absorption, while the other end of the spectrum, of the emotive tenses self-involves itself in the empirical absorption of the cognitions of the sensible manifold?

For is it not that the sensible manifold regards itself to the conceptual constructs of the practical understanding without regards to the ideological pretenses of all
religious experiences, and the practical experiences of the human understanding undertake the misfortunes of the precognitions such as; - sensing, organizing, selecting, - which all religious
experiences maintain the absorption rate of the practical experience? And, in the definition of the conceptual manifold of practical experience, the pure intuition of the precognitions of the
rational and empirical manifold retrogrades into the practical avenues of the sense experience as the pure absorptions of cognitions in the spherical sub-atmosphere of the transcendental religious
experience. But, yet it is evermoreso, that the pure understanding recognizes the phenomena and nounmena according to the * a posteriori* of the

**I.F.C. Of the Essential Postulate of Actuality**

But, in the practical, religious experiences of a pure religion, it contains the essential rational and empirical manifold of the practical understanding, which
curtails the empirical and conceptual manifold of a practical synthesis of the beginning of great transformations, and the rational and emotive conceptual constructions regulates the entrails of all
religious experiences in the cognizing of the conceptual pretenses of the formulation of conceptions. Let us reexamine the prior example of “* Absolution is in the sanctity of
marriage*” in the conceptual relations of the practical pretenses to the emotive tenses of practicality in the number of universal terms that is relative to the number of terms in
mathematics. And, if we were to examine the previous example carefully with an open mind, we are to formulate the conceptual manifold of 7 terms and one categorical sentence that includes an eighth
terms of all of the terms as the set of {1,2,3,7,8} now takes place in the conceptual manifold of the previous example. It is here where the conceptual manifold of all relative terms formulate into
the totality of all terms by the rational and emotive regulation of mathematics, and the totality of the eight terms formulates into the eighth term of a universal construct of
“

And, it is yet nevertheless in the confines of the practical religious experience, the practical mathematics of a * synthetic a priori* involves
itself in the synthesis of the rational and empirical manifold in the conceptualization of all terms involved in a categorical sentence, and the conceptual framework of the conceptual manifold can
also be considered for either of the

But, it is evermoreso, in the introspective pretenses of all religious experiences, the practical understanding is involved in the practical manifold of the sensible
mode of the scruples of practical wisdom that showers itself with the practical experiences of the phenomena mode which all practical experiences heighten itself with the self-absorbing noumenon, and
the essential modality of the practical understanding must absorb to the spherical mode of the sensible and practical manifold of religious experience itself where the practical understanding becomes
the essential framework of the practical understanding mode of itself. Yet, it is hitherto, the essential conceptual manifold of the rational and empirical understanding that the universal mode of
practical understanding draws itself unto the forthcoming of religious experience by the transport of the sensible datum which all religious experiences can be the sense perception of all phenomena
and noumenon that religious experiences comprehends the practical understanding of the conceptual manifold. For is it not that all religious experiences retrospects in the practical understanding,
which it can be the mathematical concepts of the * synthetical a priori* drawing out the practical meanings of religion itself? For is it not that the state of the universal
practical understanding infuses itself in the mathematical polytypic conceptual manifold of religion itself which can be understood by a mathematical term of a distinguished conceptual manifold?
Henceforth in the forthcoming of a practical religion, the pure understanding feeds from the universal terms of all the mathematical concepts whereas, the practical experiences borrows the empirical
understanding from exception itself to conceptualize into the practical understanding of the religious comprehension of the